Review: Mad Max: Fury Road

In Mad Max: Fury Road, Max drives a tanker truck through a desert wasteland in order to help rescue a group of women from the psychotic warlord who is pursuing them.  That’s pretty much the entire plot of Fury Road, but it fails to capture the essence of what is one of the most intense, full-throttle, and absolutely insane action films of all time.  But to reduce Fury Road by calling it an “action movie” is to ignore the craftsmanship, storytelling mastery, and the scale of what had to go into this film.  Writer/Director George Miller has returned to his original creation 30 years after Max was last seen on the big screen and has managed to build something that feels unlike anything we’ve seen before, yet entirely at home in the universe of Mad Max combining elements of all three previous films.  On the one hand, Fury Road defies description; it’s the sort of film that must simply be experienced, preferably on the big screen.  But on the other hand, it also provides so much to talk about, from its strong feminist tendencies to its impeccable stuntwork to its brilliantly crafted visuals to its surprisingly clever storytelling.  Fury Road is simply one of a kind.

Max Rockatansky first appeared on screens in 1979’s Mad Max as a highway patrol officer in a dystopian future where the roads are ruled by rogue gangs.  It was a dark, gritty, violent film, where Max’s wife and child were murdered, sending him on a quest for revenge and leaving him a shell of his former self.  1981’s The Road Warrior changed things up considerably, sending Max into the post-apocalyptic desert, where our loner hero must rely on others in order to survive while acting as a potential savior to a community in possession of the one thing that the gangs that surround them crave: fuel.  1985’s Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome was all about exploring the world created in the trilogy, giving us a look at what civilization might be like and upping the bizarre, unique look and feel of the world by a factor of 10, all while giving us one of the series’ most memorable characters in Tina Turner’s Aunty Entity, ruler of Bartertown.  All of this has no bearing on the story of Fury Road, which can be enjoyed even if you have no familiarity with Mad Max at all, but the journey the series has taken over the last 36 years gives Fury Road more weight than your average action film, and the influence of the series can be felt throughout its latest installment.

Fury Road finds Max much as he was seen at the beginning of The Road Warrior on his own with his pursuit special, braving the wasteland.  That, however, only lasts for 30 seconds, before he is captured by a gang of marauders and imprisoned to serve as a “blood bag” for the warriors of Immortan Joe, the cruel leader of this area of the wasteland.  But here’s the twist: Fury Road is not Max’s story.  It’s really the story of Imperator Furiosa, Joe’s best road warrior, who is sent on a mission with a tanker truck into the wastes to find more gasoline, but who has actually rescued Joe’s five wives, his harem of sex slaves, and is driving them away towards safety.  Max is simply brought along for the ride by Joe’s War Boys, pale, scarred warriors devoted completely to Joe, and he gets caught up in the chase.  Fury Road is Furiosa’s and the wives’ story, and Max is just along for the ride, helping here and there but mostly witnessing the women’s story.

It’s a clever bit of storytelling that wouldn’t seem so unusual if it weren’t for the way Hollywood typically treats women in action movies.  Miller could have easily had Max rescuing the women, and we would have watched a film about one man stealing women from another man, but instead he created a female road warrior, every bit Max’s equal and infinity more interesting a character.  Max is mostly a blank slate, though he carries a nightmarish history with him, and exists to serve Furiosa’s story rather than the other way around.  This twist also helps to minimize the fact that Max is no longer played by Mel Gibson but by Tom Hardy, who does a solid job but lacks the contained energy that Gibson brought to the role three decades ago.  Instead, Charlize Theron dominates the film, and I could easily watch an entire series of films dedicated entirely to her Furiosa.  She’s an ultimate, one-armed badass with a heartfelt mission to which she’s dedicated, the ultimate combination of loner and savior.  The wives all have interesting moments, having lived sheltered lives as Joe’s playthings but still strong in their own ways.  Hugh Keays-Byrne, who played the villain Toecutter in the original Mad Max, returns to the series as Joe, a villain in the same vein as Humongous from The Road Warrior but with an obsessiveness and personal vendetta behind his mask.  And then there’s Nicholas Hoult as Nux, one of Joe’s War Boys, who gets swept up in the action and becomes one of the most affecting characters in the story, as he is forced to reevaluate his views of the world.

However, the story in Fury Road is secondary to the action, but calling the film experience “action” feels dismissive and cheap.  Fury Road is a visual poem, lyrical and beautiful, and unlike anything I’ve ever seen before.  It’s basically the final half-hour of The Road Warrior expanded into a two-hour film, but it feels completely different.  Where that sequence was rough, raw, and ragged, Fury Road is sweeping, majestic, and gorgeous.  The “action” onscreen between the two films is essentially the same, with an elaborate tanker truck pursued by an army of bizarre, custom, apocalyptic vehicles, all intent on stopping the truck at any cost.  But the way it’s portrayed in Fury Road is unique and expertly choreographed.  It’s a true artistic vision straight from George Miller’s brain, and it kept me constantly on the edge of my seat.  The film is helped by the fact that almost everything we see is real, created with real vehicles and real stuntwork, with only one sequence early in the chase that takes place in a sandstorm featuring heavy computer effects.  Every crash, every explosion, and every human being dangling from the side of a vehicle hurtling through the desert really happened, giving the film a visceral feel that no amount of computer effects could accomplish.

Miller keeps things interesting by constantly varying the terrain, sending the chase through canyons, across the open desert, over dunes, and through bogs, and by throwing an ever-crazier assortment of attackers at our heroes.  What starts as a relatively normal car chase ends with the tanker truck pursued not only by a conglomeration of custom desert buggies and motorcycles, but by a musical accompaniment vehicle complete with drummers on the back and a guitarist dangling in front of speakers on the front shooting flames from his guitar and by high-flying acrobats suspended high in the air on swinging poles hoping to get the drop on the truck.  That such gonzo visuals, far from distracting you from the experience, actually serve to draw you into the film is a testament to Miller’s vision and storytelling ability.  Add to all of this one of the most engaging, energetic, and expansive musical scores I’ve ever heard, composed and performed by Junkie XL and heavy on the percussion, and the film pushes the edge of sensory overload.

Miller has one of the most bizarre careers of any writer/director.  He spent his early days crafting the original Mad Max trilogy, and then he wrote Babe, one of my all-time favorite films.  He followed it up with the only other feature films he’s made in the last twenty years: Babe: Pig in the City, Happy Feet, and Happy Feet 2.  How on earth does someone end up with those three series dominating his resume, with very little else of note?  Seemingly the three have little in common, other than a strong vision behind them, and a delight in the unexpected.  Regardless, there’s no reason for Mad Max: Fury Road to be this good.  A reboot/sequel of a thirty year old franchise without its star shouldn’t be a success, and the only reason it is has to be George Miller.  His vision both captures what made the previous films so special while embracing change and the new.  The result is an intense action movie that never slackens its pace once, a post-apocalyptic film filled with color, that is thrilling without dwelling on violence, that is led by women characters who were victims but are never exploited by the film and are strong without being stereotyped.  It’s a loud, rough, wild ride that feels like a ballet, with almost no dialogue or story but surprisingly compelling and emotional moments.  Mad Max: Fury Road might have quickly jumped not only onto the list of the top action films of all time, but is also one of the best films of the year thus far.

A

24 thoughts on “Review: Mad Max: Fury Road

  1. Wow… and here I was thinking it was just another bit of over-produced car-porn. (I didn’t see it because that was my impression from the trailers).

    Good insights into a film that seems to have overcome the genre, rather than becoming Mad Max: Road Furious 8.5…

    Liked by 1 person

    • I thought you’d find that interesting. Fury Road is unlike any other movie out there right now. It’s an action movie that is almost entirely action, and spends its time subverting the hyper-masculinity of action films. It’s a dystopian movie that’s never dour, gray, or depressing (though it can be tragic). It’s one of the most pulse-pounding films I’ve ever seen and is simply gorgeous to experience. It’s not Tomorrowland, but it’s still great.

      Like

  2. This one didn’t quite live up to the hype for me and I did feel as though the wives were a little objectified. I did enjoy it though and Charlize Theron’s Imperator Furiousa is one of the best female characters in an ‘action’ film I’ve ever seen. My review has just gone up.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’ll try to find the time to see it next week. First, when I heard about it I didn’t think it would be any good (another reboot from Hollywood? Meh.) but even the first trailer changed my mind. I knew I’d watch it, the question came to be, cinema or dvd. I am thinking cinema…

    Liked by 1 person

    • I would have had no interest in seeing it if it was made by anyone other than George Miller, but he made it a must see for me. And you should definitely see it in the cinema. The visuals are too impressive to wait until DVD.

      Like

        • OK, saw the movie in a cinema (or theater, depending on your language setting). I loved it and I am glad that didn’t wait for the DVD.

          I know we shouldn’t try to analyze movies too much but I have had some thoughts about the last 3 Mad Max movies that I’d love to explore. Basically thinking about the stuff that continuity should have ruled out (Bruce Spence playing almost the same character in #2 and #3, but the story insists on them not knowing each other, Max’ car being present in #4 etc) and that the last 3 movies really aren’t so much about Max (him being more of a catalyst for those around him, in #2: the defenders, #3: the children, #4: Furiosa). Also, in every movie Max ends up worse than in the beginning, and I am thinking that in some ways Miller is retelling the same myth with each of the sequels, a myth where Max’ role is almost that of an, for want of a better word, angel.

          The movie is practically one long action sequence that could have been ridiculous, and yet I think there is much more to Miller’s work.

          Liked by 1 person

  4. I share your feeling with regards to finding the film a unique experience, it definitely breaks free from ‘action film’ convention. It’s unusual for me to have so few complaints about a film, especially when it comes to the portrayal of women so that’s a huge feat. In addition to the film being poetic, your review was a beautiful read :).
    I’ll be putting my review up online later on if you’re interested to see where we agree or clash.

    Liked by 1 person

      • No worries, your passion really comes through in your writing so I really enjoy reading your reviews! Normally I’m not much of a consumer of reviews because some writers have a tendency to enjoy criticism and explanation as to how you should perceive a film, but your approach is a lot more interesting.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Thanks! I’m not a big fan of criticism, and I generally have a positive outlook when it comes to movies, so my reviews tend to reflect that. I also only go see movies I’m expecting to enjoy, so I’m rarely disappointed, although it does happen. As far as explanation goes, I would rather people make up their own minds, unless I see something that many people seem to be missing, but I do like to analyze movies and look more into their meaning on occasion, but I don’t typically include that in the reviews.

          Liked by 1 person

          • It seems like you’re on my wavelength when it comes to believing films are meant to be enjoyed rather than ruthlessly critiqued for its apparent flaws, and with that in mind I only feel compelled to review a film I enjoyed overall. Positive outlooks are productive – no point in ruining someone else’s enjoyment when you can just rave about a work of art instead. Analysis is healthy though, as you (more or less) say, and I think an intellectual approach is cool because usually the writer/director wanted to convey a message in their work.

            Liked by 1 person

            • You’re exactly right on all counts. It seems like there’s nothing people like more than trashing something, especially if it’s something many people liked, but I’ve never been that way. Why spend the money and time to go see something if you’re determined not to enjoy it. Of course, people so often see only want they want to see, and if you go in already complaining about something, then that’s what you’ll be focused on and the movie will just reinforce your preconceptions.

              Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: Tomorrowland Analysis: There’s a Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow, Just a Dream Away | The Love Pirate

  6. Pingback: My Top 12 (and Bottom 3) at the Movies in 5 | The Love Pirate

  7. Pingback: My Top 12 (and Bottom 3) at the Movies in 2015 | The Love Pirate

  8. Pingback: What I’d like to see from tomorrow’s 88th Academy Awards nominations | The Love Pirate

  9. Pingback: 88th Academy Awards Picks and Predictions (2016) | The Love Pirate

  10. Pingback: 2016 Oscars Recap | The Love Pirate

Tell me what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s